IJFIRH - 2026, Volume - IV, Issue - I [January to March 2026]

e-ISSN No- 3048-6270

Published by Homoeopathic Chronicles

STRESS AND ADJUSTMENT DISORDER: A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF HOMOEOPATHY WITH AN INTEGRATED PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

Rehna Rahim¹, Lalithaa K.S2, Sakthi Silvan3, Revathi Ravikumar4

1B.H.M.S., M.D. (Hom.) Scholar, Department of Psychiatry, Vinayaka Missions Homoeopathic Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.

2B.H.M.S., M.D. (Hom.) Psychiatry, Ph.D. (Homoeopathy), Professor and Head, Department of Psychiatry, Vinayaka Mission's Homoeopathic Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.

3B.H.M.S., M.D. (Hom.) Scholar, Department of Psychiatry, Vinayaka Mission's Homoeopathic Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.

4B.H.M.S., M.Sc. (Psychology), M.D. (Hom.) Scholar, Department of Psychiatry, Vinayaka Mission's Homoeopathic Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.

Article Received: 9 Feb 2026 - Accepted: 26 Feb 2026 - Article published online: 06 March 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59939/3048-6270.2026.v4.i1.15

ABSTRACT

Stress is an inevitable aspect of life and plays a central role in the development of psychological disturbances. While most individuals adapt successfully to stressful life events, some develop maladaptive emotional and behavioural responses that interfere with functioning resulting in adjustment disorder. Adjustment disorder occupies an intermediate position between normal adaptive stress reactions and major psychiatric conditions and is characterized by a close temporal relationship with identifiable psychosocial stressors. Despite its high prevalence in clinical practice, the condition remains conceptually complex, with diagnostic challenges and limited consensus regarding optimal treatment strategies.

This narrative review examines the concepts of stress and adjustment disorder from psychological and psychiatric perspectives and explores the scope of homoeopathy as a complementary therapeutic approach. Relevant literature from psychiatry, psychology, psychosomatic medicine, and homoeopathy was reviewed to understand stress appraisal, coping mechanisms, diagnostic considerations, and available management strategies. Psychological interventions remain central to the treatment of adjustment disorder, while pharmacological approaches have limited and inconsistent evidence and are generally used selectively.

Homoeopathy with its emphasis on individualisation and mind body integration, conceptually aligns with psychological principles of person centred care and may support adaptive adjustment in stress related conditions. This review highlights the potential value of an integrated psychological and homoeopathic perspective in addressing adjustment disorder, while emphasizing the need for further methodologically robust research to establish evidence-based integrative models of care.

KEYWORDS: Stress; Adjustment Disorder; Homoeopathy; Psychological Integration; Psychosomatic Medicine

INTRODUCTION

Stress is an inherent aspect of human life and an essential determinant of psychological functioning. Across the lifespan, individuals encounter a wide range of psychosocial stressors related to education, occupation, interpersonal relationships, health challenges, and major life transitions. While stress is often managed through adaptive coping mechanisms, individual differences in vulnerability, resilience, coping skills, and social support significantly influence how effectively people adjust to changing circumstances.(1)

Adjustment disorder describes a clinical condition in which the psychological response to an identifiable stressor becomes maladaptive, resulting in emotional or behavioural symptoms that interfere with social, occupational, or academic functioning.(2) Conceptually adjustment disorder occupies an intermediate position between normal stress reactions and major psychiatric disorders, reflecting a disturbance in the process of psychological adaptation rather than the presence of a primary mood or anxiety disorder.(3) It is among the most frequently diagnosed conditions in clinical and consultation liaison psychiatry underscoring its practical relevance in everyday mental health settings.(2)

Recent revisions in diagnostic classification systems have emphasized the stress-related nature and functional impairment associated with adjustment disorder, contributing to renewed clinical and research interest in the condition. Although often considered time limited, emerging clinical and epidemiological observations suggest that adjustment disorder may be associated with significant distress, impaired functioning, and increased vulnerability in certain populations, including adolescents and individuals undergoing major life transitions. These findings highlight the importance of understanding adjustment disorder beyond a transient or benign response to stress.(4)

Current management strategies for adjustment disorder primarily focus on psychological interventions aimed at facilitating emotional processing, improving coping skills, and restoring adaptive functioning. Pharmacological treatment is commonly used in clinical practice but has limited and inconsistent evidence and is generally recommended only for selected cases and short-term symptom relief. Variability in individual responses to treatment, along with limitations in access to structured psychological care, underscores the need for individualized and holistic approaches to management.(5)

Homoeopathy with its emphasis on individualisation and the integration of mental and physical dimensions of health, offers a therapeutic perspective that conceptually aligns with psychological principles of person centred care.(6) Exploring the interface between psychological understanding and homoeopathic principles may contribute to a broader and more integrative framework for addressing adjustment disorder, particularly in the context of stress related maladaptation.(7)

The present narrative review aims to examine stress and adjustment disorder from psychological and psychiatric perspectives and to explore the scope of an integrated psychological and homoeopathic approach in understanding and managing adjustment disorder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design

The present article is a non-systematic narrative review intended to synthesize and critically discuss existing literature on stress, adjustment disorder, and homoeopathy, with particular emphasis on psychological concepts and the scope of an integrated approach. A narrative review design was chosen to allow conceptual exploration, clinical interpretation, and integration of diverse theoretical and therapeutic perspectives rather than quantitative comparison of outcomes.

Sources of Literature

Relevant literature was identified through electronic database searches including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ResearchGate. In addition standard psychiatry and psychology textbooks, review articles, and peer-reviewed journals in the fields of psychiatry, psychology, psychosomatic medicine, and homoeopathy were consulted to ensure adequate conceptual and clinical coverage.

Search Strategy

The literature search was conducted for articles published primarily between 2000 and 2024, using combinations of the following keywords: stress, psychological stress, adjustment disorder, adjustment reaction, stress-related disorders, coping mechanisms, resilience, psychotherapy, psychosomatic medicine, homoeopathy, constitutional treatment, and integrative approach.
Reference lists of relevant articles were also screened to identify additional pertinent literature.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Literature was included if it fulfilled one or more of the following criteria:

• Discussed stress or adjustment disorder from a psychiatric or psychological perspective

• Addressed diagnostic concepts, clinical features, epidemiology, or management of adjustment disorder

• Explored psychological interventions, coping strategies, or stress-response models

• Presented homoeopathic concepts, clinical observations, case series, or reviews related to stress-related or adjustment-related conditions

Articles were excluded if they:

• Focused exclusively on psychiatric disorders other than adjustment disorder without reference to stress-related maladaptation

• Were not available in the English language

• Contained insufficient relevance to the objectives of the review

Data Synthesis

The selected literature was reviewed qualitatively, and key themes were identified and organized into conceptual domains, including psychological models of stress, diagnostic understanding of adjustment disorder, therapeutic approaches in psychology, homoeopathic perspectives, and integrative models of care.(4)

Methodological Limitations

As a narrative review, this study does not employ systematic review methodology, formal quality appraisal, or statistical analysis. The findings are therefore intended to offer theoretical and clinical insight rather than definitive evidence of efficacy. The need for future systematic reviews and controlled clinical studies is acknowledged.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Stress : Psychological Conceptual Framework

Stress is a fundamental psychological phenomenon that arises when individuals perceive environmental demands as exceeding their adaptive capacity. It is not determined solely by external stressors, but by the individual’s subjective appraisal of those stressors and the perceived availability of coping resources. Common life stressors include academic or occupational pressures, interpersonal conflicts, health concerns, and major life transitions, all of which require continuous psychological adjustment.(8)

Psychological models conceptualize stress as a dynamic interaction between the individual and the environment. According to the cognitive appraisal framework, emotional responses to stress are shaped by how a person interprets a situation and evaluates their ability to cope with it. When a stressor is perceived as threatening and coping resources are considered inadequate, emotional reactions such as anxiety, sadness, irritability, or emotional overwhelm may emerge. These emotional responses are often accompanied by physiological arousal and behavioural changes.(9)

Coping strategies play a central role in determining stress outcomes. Adaptive coping mechanisms, such as problem-solving, emotional regulation, cognitive reframing, and seeking social support, facilitate effective adjustment and psychological balance. In contrast, maladaptive coping strategies, including avoidance, rumination, and emotional suppression, may intensify distress and impair functioning. Persistent reliance on maladaptive coping increases vulnerability to stress-related psychological conditions.

Stress also has a psychosomatic dimension, wherein psychological distress may manifest through physical symptoms such as sleep disturbances, fatigue, headaches, or gastrointestinal complaints. This mind body interaction highlights the interconnected nature of psychological and physical processes in stress responses and reinforces the need for holistic perspectives in understanding stress-related disorders.(10)

Individual differences significantly influence stress responses. Factors such as personality traits, prior life experiences, social support, cultural context, and psychological resilience determine how stress is perceived and managed. While some individuals demonstrate flexibility and resilience, others experience difficulty adapting even to moderate stressors. This variability explains why similar stressors can result in diverse psychological outcomes and provides a conceptual foundation for understanding maladaptive adjustment.(1)

Adjustment Disorder : Clinical and Psychological Understanding

Adjustment disorder is characterized by a maladaptive emotional and behavioral response to one or more identifiable psychosocial stressors, occurring within a close temporal relationship to the stressor and resulting in significant functional impairment.(11) The condition reflects a disturbance in the process of psychological adaptation, where the individual’s response to stress is disproportionate to the nature or intensity of the precipitating event.

Clinically adjustment disorder occupies an intermediate position between normal stress reactions and major psychiatric disorders such as depressive and anxiety disorders. Common manifestations include low mood, anxiety, excessive worry, irritability, emotional lability, and difficulties in concentration or decision-making. Behavioral changes such as social withdrawal, reduced academic or occupational performance, and disturbances in daily functioning may also be present. Symptoms typically emerge within weeks to months following exposure to the stressor and are expected to resolve as adaptation occurs or the stressor subsides.(12)

From a psychological perspective, adjustment disorder arises from an interaction between the stressor and individual vulnerability factors rather than the stressor alone. Limited coping skills, inadequate social support, personality traits, prior adverse experiences, and concurrent psychological or medical conditions may increase susceptibility. Consequently, individuals exposed to similar stressors may exhibit markedly different psychological outcomes, emphasizing the role of subjective appraisal and coping capacity.(1)

Diagnostic systems such as the DSM and ICD define adjustment disorder primarily by the presence of an identifiable stressor and a clear temporal association between the stressor and symptom onset. However, the diagnosis has been associated with ongoing debate due to symptom overlap with depressive and anxiety disorders and the absence of sharply defined symptom thresholds. Despite these challenges, adjustment disorder remains one of the most frequently diagnosed conditions in clinical and consultation liaison psychiatry.(3)

Although often described as a self limiting condition, adjustment disorder is associated with significant distress and functional impairment. In certain populations, including adolescents and individuals undergoing major life transitions, it has been linked to increased risk of self-harm and suicidal behaviour.(12) These observations highlight the clinical importance of timely identification and supportive intervention.

Understanding adjustment disorder as a stress response condition underscores the need for interventions that focus on facilitating adaptive coping and emotional regulation rather than solely addressing symptom severity. This conceptualization supports individualized and holistic approaches that address the psychological experience of stress and promote adaptive adjustment.

Review of Clinical Evidence and Therapeutic Approaches

Psychological interventions constitute the primary therapeutic approach for adjustment disorder, given the central role of stress appraisal, coping mechanisms, and emotional regulation in its development. Supportive psychotherapy, cognitive behavioural strategies, stress management techniques, and brief structured interventions have demonstrated benefit in facilitating emotional processing, improving coping skills, and enhancing resilience.(13) Recent literature has also reported favorable outcomes with low-intensity and internet-based psychological interventions, particularly for individuals with mild to moderate symptoms and limited access to in-person care.(14)

Pharmacological treatment is frequently employed in clinical practice, especially in presentations with prominent anxiety or depressive symptoms. However, available evidence suggests that pharmacotherapy has limited and inconsistent support in the treatment of adjustment disorder. Antidepressants and anxiolytics may offer short-term symptomatic relief in selected cases, but there is no established pharmacological gold standard for this condition. Concerns regarding over-prescription, adverse effects, and the risk of addressing symptoms without facilitating adaptive coping have been highlighted in the literature. Consequently, pharmacological interventions are generally recommended as adjunctive and time-limited rather than first-line treatments.(15)

Within the homoeopathic literature, evidence related to adjustment disorder and stress-related maladaptation predominantly consists of case reports, case series, and observational studies. These reports commonly describe improvements in emotional stability, stress tolerance, sleep patterns, and overall functioning following individualized homoeopathic treatment. Some studies have incorporated standardized psychological assessment tools to monitor symptom change, reflecting efforts to align homoeopathic practice with conventional outcome measures.(2) However, the existing body of evidence is limited by methodological constraints, including small sample sizes, lack of control groups, and variability in outcome measures.

Integrative approaches combining psychological interventions with homoeopathic treatment have been described in the literature as supportive models of care for stress related conditions. Such approaches emphasize individualisation, holistic assessment, and attention to cognitive, emotional, and psychosomatic dimensions of distress.(6) Rather than positioning homoeopathy as a standalone or primary treatment, these integrative models view it as a complementary intervention that may support adaptive coping and emotional stabilization alongside established psychological care.

Overall, the available clinical literature underscores the importance of individualized and holistic management strategies in adjustment disorder. Psychological interventions remain central to treatment, pharmacological approaches should be applied cautiously and selectively, and complementary modalities such as homoeopathy may be considered as adjunctive supports within a comprehensive, patient centred framework. Further well-designed clinical studies are required to clarify the role and effectiveness of integrative approaches in the management of adjustment disorder.(16)

Homoeopathic Perspective on Stress and Adjustment

Homoeopathy approaches stress-related conditions from a holistic perspective that emphasizes the dynamic interaction between the mind and the body. Central to homoeopathic philosophy is the understanding that psychological and emotional disturbances are not isolated phenomena but are intimately connected with the individual’s overall state of health. Stress, from this viewpoint, is seen as a disturbance of the individual’s internal equilibrium, manifesting through mental, emotional, and physical symptoms that reflect the person’s unique response to external challenges.(7)

In the context of adjustment disorder homoeopathy places particular importance on individual susceptibility and the subjective experience of stress. Rather than focusing solely on diagnostic categories homoeopathic assessment seeks to understand how a person perceives, processes, and reacts to stressful life events. Emotional responses such as anxiety, fear, sadness, irritability, or feelings of being overwhelmed are considered meaningful expressions of the individual’s adaptive struggle and are evaluated alongside physical symptoms and behavioral changes.(17)

A key principle in homoeopathic practice is individualisation, which aligns closely with psychological models that recognize variability in stress responses. Two individuals exposed to similar stressors may exhibit markedly different emotional reactions and coping patterns, reflecting differences in temperament, personality, past experiences, and resilience. Homoeopathy acknowledges this variability by tailoring treatment to the totality of symptoms presented by the individual rather than applying a uniform approach based on diagnosis alone.(18)

The psychosomatic orientation of homoeopathy further reinforces its relevance to stress-related conditions such as adjustment disorder. Emotional distress is often accompanied by somatic complaints including sleep disturbances, fatigue, headaches, gastrointestinal symptoms, or changes in appetite.(19) Homoeopathic case taking gives equal importance to mental, emotional, and physical symptoms, thereby offering a framework that naturally accommodates the mind body interplay observed in adjustment disorder.(6)

Clinical literature in homoeopathy has reported the use of individualized remedies in stress related and adjustment related conditions often emphasizing improvements in emotional stability, coping ability, and overall well-being. While much of the available evidence consists of case reports, case series, and observational studies, these reports highlight the potential role of homoeopathy in addressing the subjective distress and functional impairment associated with maladaptive stress responses. At the same time the need for more methodologically robust research is widely acknowledged within the homoeopathic community.(20)

By focusing on the individual’s internal experience of stress and their unique pattern of symptoms homoeopathy offers a therapeutic perspective that complements psychological approaches. Rather than aiming to suppress symptoms the homoeopathic approach seeks to support the individual’s adaptive capacity and restore balance at emotional and physical levels.(7) This conceptual alignment provides a rationale for exploring integrative models that combine psychological understanding with homoeopathic principles in the management of adjustment disorder.

DISCUSSION

Viewed through a clinical and psychological lens, adjustment disorder reflects a disturbance in the process of adapting to significant life stressors. The management of adjustment disorder requires an approach that acknowledges both the psychological meaning of stress and the individual’s subjective response to it. Psychological models emphasize cognitive appraisal, emotional regulation, coping strategies, and resilience as key determinants of whether an individual adapts successfully or develops maladaptive stress responses. So Adjustment disorder is best understood not merely as a symptom cluster but as a disturbance in the process of adaptation to life stressors.(2)

Psychological interventions aim to assist individuals in identifying stressors, processing emotional responses, modifying maladaptive cognitions, and developing adaptive coping strategies. Supportive counselling and structured psychotherapeutic approaches facilitate insight, enhance emotional regulation, and promote restoration of functional balance.(21) These interventions address the conscious psychological processes involved in adjustment and are considered central to clinical management.

Homoeopathy complements this framework by focusing on the individual’s internal susceptibility and holistic symptom expression. Through detailed case-taking homoeopathic assessment captures emotional states, behavioural tendencies, and psychosomatic manifestations that may accompany maladaptive stress responses.(18) This approach emphasizes individualisation and the integration of mental and physical symptoms, which aligns with person-centred models of care commonly used in psychological practice.(7)

An integrated psychological and homoeopathic approach does not propose homoeopathy as a substitute for established psychological interventions but rather as a complementary modality within a broader therapeutic framework. Psychological interventions may support cognitive and emotional processing of stressors while homoeopathic treatment may contribute to emotional stabilization and improved psychosomatic balance in selected individuals. Such integration may be particularly relevant in cases where symptoms cause significant distress and functional impairment but do not meet thresholds for major psychiatric disorders.

From a clinical perspective integration encourages a nuanced understanding of adjustment disorder that extends beyond diagnostic criteria. It allows clinicians to consider the personal meaning of stressors, individual coping styles, emotional vulnerability, and mind body interactions when formulating management strategies. This holistic perspective may enhance therapeutic engagement, patient satisfaction, and continuity of care.(15)

By combining psychological understanding with homoeopathic principles in a complementary manner, an integrated approach offers a patient centred framework for addressing adjustment disorder. While the conceptual alignment between these approaches is evident further empirical research using standardized outcome measures is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness and clinical applicability of integrated models in routine practice.

CONCLUSION

Adjustment disorder represents a clinically significant response to identifiable psychosocial stressors and occupies an important position at the interface between normal adaptive reactions and more severe psychiatric conditions. Although often regarded as a self-limiting disorder, adjustment disorder may be associated with considerable emotional distress, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life particularly in vulnerable populations. Its close relationship with stress appraisal, individual vulnerability, and coping capacity underscores the importance of approaches that extend beyond symptom-focused management.

Psychological perspectives emphasize the central role of cognitive appraisal, emotional regulation, and adaptive coping in facilitating recovery from stress-related disturbances. Psychological interventions remain the cornerstone of management for adjustment disorder supporting individuals in processing stressors restoring emotional balance, and enhancing resilience. Pharmacological treatment while commonly used in clinical practice has limited and inconsistent evidence and is generally recommended for selective and short term use.

Homoeopathy with its emphasis on individualisation and mind body integration offers a complementary perspective that conceptually aligns with psychological principles of person centred care. By focusing on the subjective experience of stress and the interconnectedness of mental and physical symptoms homoeopathy may provide supportive value for some individuals when used alongside established psychological interventions. An integrated psychological and homoeopathic approach thus offers a broader framework for understanding and addressing stress-related maladaptation.

This narrative review highlights the potential relevance of integrating psychological understanding with homoeopathic principles in the management of adjustment disorder. However the current evidence base remains limited and further methodologically robust research is required to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and clinical applicability of integrative models. Future studies employing standardized diagnostic criteria, validated outcome measures, and well-designed comparative methodologies may help advance holistic and patient-centred care for individuals experiencing adjustment disorder.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The author sincerely acknowledges the support and guidance provided by the faculty of the Department of Homoeopathic Psychiatry, Vinayaka Mission’s Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Salem.

Conflict of Interest:

The author declares no conflict of interest related to this study.

Funding:

No external funding was received for this study.

REFERENCES

1.  Schneiderman N, Ironson G, Siegel SD. STRESS AND HEALTH: Psychological, Behavioral, and Biological Determinants. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:607–28. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144141 PubMed PMID: 17716101; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2568977.

2.  O’Donnell ML, Agathos JA, Metcalf O, Gibson K, Lau W. Adjustment Disorder: Current Developments and Future Directions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul;16(14):2537. doi:10.3390/ijerph16142537 PubMed PMID: 31315203; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6678970.

3.  Patra BN, Sarkar S. Adjustment Disorder: Current Diagnostic Status. Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(1):4–9. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.112193 PubMed PMID: 23833335; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3701359.

4.  Zelviene P, Kazlauskas E. Adjustment disorder: current perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Jan 25;14:375–81. doi:10.2147/NDT.S121072 PubMed PMID: 29416339; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5790100.

5.  Carta MG, Balestrieri M, Murru A, Hardoy MC. Adjustment Disorder: epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2009 Jun 26;5:15. doi:10.1186/1745-0179-5-15 PubMed PMID: 19558652; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2710332.

6.  Bellavite P. Homeopathy and integrative medicine: keeping an open mind. J Med Person. 2015;13(1):1–6. doi:10.1007/s12682-014-0198-x PubMed PMID: 25815160; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4363517.

7.  (PDF) THE ART OF INDIVIDUALIZED HOMEOPATHY IN TREATING ADJUSTMENT DISORDER: INSIGHTS FROM A CASE SERIES. ResearchGate. 2025 Aug 21. doi:10.63001/tbs.2025.v20.i03.pp420-424

8.  https://www.apa.org [Internet]. [cited 2026 Feb 21]. Stress. Available from: https://www.apa.org/topics/stress

9.  Maqsood A, Gul S, Noureen N, Yaswi A. Dynamics of Perceived Stress, Stress Appraisal, and Coping Strategies in an Evolving Educational Landscape. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jun 25;14(7):532. doi:10.3390/bs14070532 PubMed PMID: 39062355; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC11274181.

10.  Algorani EB, Gupta V. Coping Mechanisms. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [cited 2026 Feb 21]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559031/ PubMed PMID: 32644457.

11.  Administration SA and MHS. Table 3.19, DSM-IV to DSM-5 Adjustment Disorders Comparison [Text] [Internet]. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 2016 [cited 2026 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519704/table/ch3.t19/

12.  CASEY P, BAILEY S. Adjustment disorders: the state of the art. World Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;10(1):11–8. doi:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00003.x PubMed PMID: 21379346; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3048515.

13.  Maercker A, Bachem RC, Lorenz L, Moser CT, Berger T. Adjustment Disorders Are Uniquely Suited for eHealth Interventions: Concept and Case Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2015 May 8;2(2):e15. doi:10.2196/mental.4157 PubMed PMID: 26543920; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4607384.

14.  (PDF) Effect of an internet-based intervention for adjustment disorder on meaning in life and enjoyment. ResearchGate. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03177-w

15.  ResearchGate [Internet]. [cited 2026 Feb 21]. (PDF) Adjustment Disorder and Its Clinical Management. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348435315_Adjustment_Disorder_and_Its_Clinical_Management doi:10.2310/FM.13027

16.  Shafran R, Bennett SD, McKenzie Smith M. Interventions to Support Integrated Psychological Care and Holistic Health Outcomes in Paediatrics. Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Aug 16;5(3):44. doi:10.3390/healthcare5030044 PubMed PMID: 28812985; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5618172.

17.  ResearchGate [Internet]. [cited 2026 Feb 21]. (PDF) CASE STUDY Adjustment disorder and its homoeopathic approach. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365899596_CASE_STUDY_Adjustment_disorder_and_its_homoeopathic_approach

18.  Moorthi SK, Pertin S, Vishnupriya SV, Muraleedharan KC, Radhika P. Homoeopathy for Adjustment Disorder: A Case Series. Homœopathic Links. 2021 Mar;34(1):41–51. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1721057

19.  Lalithaa DrK, Shaheen DrC. Efficacy of homoeopathic medicines in adjustment disorders among college freshers. Int J Homoeopathic Sci. 2020 Jan 1;4(1):115–7. doi:10.33545/26164485.2020.v4.i1b.137

20.  (PDF) The Role of Homeopathy in Addressing Mental Health Issues: An Evidence-Based Approach. ResearchGate. doi:10.36676/jrps.v15.i1.1653

21.  Macdonald G, Livingstone N, Hanratty J, McCartan C, Cotmore R, Cary M, et al. Types of interventions. In: The effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for maltreated children and adolescents: an evidence synthesis [Internet]. NIHR Journals Library; 2016 [cited 2026 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK385382/

Corresponding author

Dr. Rehna Rahim
Department of Homoeopathic Psychiatry, Vinayaka Mission’s Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital, Salem – 636308, Tamil Nadu, India
Email: rehnagruz@gmail.com
Phone: 9207937797